Brophy's Litigation Blog

Showing posts with label employment equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label employment equality. Show all posts

Friday, May 30, 2014

CAN I BE FORCED TO RETIRE?

The answer: maybe.

As of the 1st of January 2014, the State pension age has increased from 65 to 66, with further increases due in the coming years to 67 and then 68. Despite this, there is no statutory mandatory retirement age in Ireland, except for certain Public Sector jobs.

It is not unlawful under the Employment Equality Acts 1998-2011, for an employer or an organisation to impose a compulsory retirement age. However, case law provides that compulsory retirement must be objectively justified by reference to legitimate purpose and aims. 

In Saunders v CHC Ireland Limited DEC-E/2011/142, the Equality Officer found that the mandatory retirement age of 55, was an appropriate and necessary aim, given that the role of winchman required a certain physicality. It was found that the retirement age was necessary to protect the health and safety of employees and customers and that the complainant was not discriminated against on the grounds of age.

In Elizabeth Sweeney v Aer Lingus Teo DEC-E2013-135, the Equality Officer concluded that management had failed to establish that the complainant’s compulsory retirement at 65 years “served a legitimate aim, or purpose”. The Equality Officer noted that a pension entitlement does not necessitate retirement and that in the absence of justification for the age discrimination, the claimant was entitled to succeed in her action. Thus, it is an important reminder to employers to review their retirement policy to include a reference as to why the employer retires workers at a particular age.

In the case of Hospira v Roper & Others LC 29/4/2013; the Labour Court held that differences in redundancy payments paid to complainants, as compared to their younger colleagues, fell within section 34 (3) (d) of the Employment Equality Act, thus permitting an exception to age discrimination. This is a significant break in the recent line of authorities on the requirement for objective justification in age discrimination cases and will have implications for employers in the context of compulsory retirement.

So is there change on the horizon? A new private members bill was recently tabled to prohibit employers from imposing compulsory retirement ages on their employees. The bill, which is based on similar progressive legislation elsewhere, including the UK and US, will introduce a voluntary system of retirement. The employer will however be entitled to provide financial incentives for voluntary retirement at a specified age.

If you are experiencing difficulties in this area or would like to discuss any employment matters further, please contact Catriona Sharkey – Catriona[at]brophysolicitors.ie
 
Catriona Sharkey

Thursday, June 27, 2013

HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE

Employers in Ireland are placed under an obligation by The Employment Equality Acts 1998-2011 to prevent harassment in the workplace.

The Employment Equality Act 1998 as amended by the Equality Act 2004, prohibits discrimination in relation to employment on nine grounds namely, gender, marital status, family status, race, age, disability, religious belief, sexual orientation and membership of the Traveller community.

Harassment is defined by The Employment Equality Acts 1998 and 2004 as “unwanted conduct” which is related to any of the nine discriminatory grounds. Such conduct includes spoken words, gestures or the production, display or circulation of written words, pictures or other material. Sexual harassment refers to the unwanted conduct of a sexual nature. The purpose of such conduct in both harassment and sexual harassment cases must be the ‘violation of a person’s dignity and creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for the person.’

In a school or college case this can not only cover behaviour by a boss or supervisor and a co-worker, but also that of pupils and students.

In a reported settlement, a retired teacher successfully brought a bullying claim against his employer for the actions of his students. The teacher claimed he was subject to homophobic abuse by students in a school and college under the control of the Louth Vocational Education Committee. His claim was based on the failure of his employer to adequately reprimand the students and to provide him with the necessary support. He settled the case for a sum equal to one year’s wages. 

All employers are advised to adhere to the best practices stated in the Employment Equality Act, 1998 (Code of Practice) (Harassment) Order, 2012. This code provides the recommended steps for the prevention and elimination of harassment and sexual harassment in the workplaces. It sets out best practices for managing and investigating complaints. Although the Code is not legally enforceable, it is admissible in evidence and may if relevant be considered during any court or tribunal proceedings. 

Both employers and employees are encouraged to contact Brophy Solicitors for further advice and information regarding workplace harassment.

Elaine Hickey
Brophy Solicitors


Read more:
Gay teacher settles action over alleged bullying